Disposed

FPA-PMLA-2186/GOA/2018 of M/s. Navdeep Agriculture and Prop. Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Goa

ATFP20 Aug 2019FPA-PMLA-2186/GOA/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim stay applications in PMLA matters listed on dearness allowance grounds. Court directed Investigating Officer to appear with records and complain at next hearing.

What did the court decide?

Listing of matter fixed for 01.10.2019; Directions issued to Investigating Officer regarding presence and filing of complaint.

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-2186/GOA/2018 of M/s. Navdeep Agriculture and Prop. Pvt… — Narcotics (NDPS) | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT ACTs AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1. MP-PMLA-4340/GOA/2018 (Stay)
FPA-PMLA-2183/GOA/2018
Mst. Ishwar Sarda	…	Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, GOA	…	Respondent
2. MP-PMLA-4342/GOA/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2184/GOA/2018
Sh. Anand Sarda	…	Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, GOA	…	Respondent
3. MP-PMLA-4344/GOA/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2185/GOA/2018
Mst. Eshan Sarda	…	Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, GOA	…	Respondent
4. MP-PMLA-4346/GOA/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2186/GOA/2018
M/s. Navdeep Agriculture and Prop. Pvt. Ltd.	…	Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, GOA	…	Respondent
5. MP-PMLA-4348/GOA/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2187/GOA/2018
Smt. Ashadevi Sarda	…	Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director
Directorate of Enforcement, GOA	…	Respondent
&
6. MP-PMLA-4340/GOA/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2188/GOA/2018
Sh. Nandkishore Sarda	…	Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director
Directorate of Enforcement, GOA	…	Respondent

¶3

FPA-PMLA-2183-2188/GOA/2018

¶4

Page 1 of 2

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the Appellants : Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER

¶7

ORDER 20.08.2019

¶8

The ld. Counsel of the appellants submits that they are not chargsheeted and even their names are not reflected in the ECIR. According to the ld. Counsel for the appellant no copy of the prosecution complaint has been served.

¶9

Mr. Atul Tripathi, counsel for the respondent states that prosecution complaint in response of the O.C. has already been filed. As far as present appellants are concerned, he is not aware as to whether the prosecution complaint filed or not.

¶10

We are directing that I.O. shall remain present alongwith the records on the next date of hearing in case the prosecution complaint has filed, copy of the same shall also be filed by the next date with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant.

¶11

List on 1^st October, 2019.

¶12

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶13

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶14

New Delhi, 20^th August, 2019 ‘s’

¶15

FPA-PMLA-2183-2188/GOA/2018

¶16

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-2186/GOA/2018 of M/s. Navdeep Agriculture and Prop. Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Goa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-2186/GOA/2018 of M/s. Navdeep Agriculture and Prop. Pvt. Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Goa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases