Interim order in appeal and reference regarding release of frozen funds. Application listed for disposal on 10th April, 2019 after respondent is granted time to file reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3698/BNG/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1878/BNG/2017
CEO, Karnataka State Board Of AUQAF … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Chidananda URS BG, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. S. K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 07.02.2019
FPA-PMLA-1878/BNG/2017
Pleadings in the above said matter are complete.
Counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has filed the representation seeking direction to release the funds belonging to the Board lying with M/s. Vijaya Bank, Chintamani Branch to the tune of Rs. 2,29,45,465/- and Rs. 1,71,00,000/- in favour of M/s. Vijaya Bank, Chintamani Branch. The copies have been handed over to the learned counsel for the respondent. Counsel will verify in the Registry and see that the same is listed.
In the meanwhile, respondent is granted four week’s time to file the
reply.
List this application for disposal on 10th April, 2019.
FPA-PMLA-1878/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 2
Right to file the rejoinder is closed.
List the application alongwith the appeal on 10th April, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra)
Member
New Delhi,
07th February, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1878/BNG/2017
Page 2 of 2
CEO, Karnataka State Board Of AUQAF
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
