Appeal/admission in a money laundering matter where the reply was not filed. The court granted an additional opportunity to file the reply and listed the matter for hearing.
One more opportunity granted to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3923/DLI/2017 (Stay)
FPA-PMLA-1878/BNG/2017
CEO, Karnataka State Board … Appellant/Applicant Of AUQAF Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Sh. Chdananda URS BG, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN MS. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 05.01.2018
FPA-PMLA-1878/BNG/2017
Reply has not been filed. One more opportunity is granted to file the
same within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 26th April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 5th January, 2018 ‘S’
FPA-PMLA-1878/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
AUQAF
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
