Order to assist respondent in removing unnecessary party and filing refund application; list for order.
Order to assist respondent in removing unnecessary party and filing refund application; list for order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3698/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1878/BNG/2017
CEO, Karnataka State Board … Appellant/Applicant Of AUQAF
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Sh. Chidananda URS BG, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 04.12.2018
FPA-PMLA-1878/BNG/2017
Counsel for the appellant states that the appellant who is the Respondent No.9 in the appeal no. 1874/2017 is not the necessary party. He would be moving the application for deleting the appellant as Respondent no.9 in the said appeal. He will also file the application for refund of money. Let the same be done in the registry within two weeks from today.
List on 7th February, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 4th December, 2018 ‘K’ FPA-PMLA-1878/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
CEO, Karnataka State Board Of AUQAF
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
