The Appellate Tribunal recorded that the High Court of Karnataka had stayed the proceedings pending in six writ petitions. The Tribunal directed appellants to produce copies of writ petitions and orders while the respondent was asked to verify the status.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-3352/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1727/BNG/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Neelkanth Rathod | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
| 2. MP-PMLA-3353/BNG/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3354/BNG/2017 (Exe.) FPA-PMLA-1728/BNG/2017 |
||
| Smt. Tarabai | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
| 3. MP-PMLA-3355/BNG/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3356/BNG/2017 (Exe.) FPA-PMLA-1729/BNG/2017 |
||
| Smt. Sindhu | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
| 4. MP-PMLA-3357/BNG/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3358/BNG/2017 (Exe.) FPA-PMLA-1730/BNG/2017 |
||
| Shri Tarasingh Chittu Chavan | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
| 5. MP-PMLA-3359/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1731/BNG/2017 |
||
| Shri Rahul | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
| 6. MP-PMLA-3360/BNG/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3361/BNG/2017 (Exe.) FPA-PMLA-1732/BNG/2017 |
||
| Sri Seetharam | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-1727-1733/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 2
7. MP-PMLA-3362/BNG/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3363/BNG/2017 (Exe.) FPA-PMLA-1733/BNG/2017 Shri Akshay … Appellant
Shri Akshay
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Advocate Mr. Imran Alam, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Mohammad Faraz, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 15.02.2019
FPA-PMLA-1727-1733/BNG/2017
On 11th May, 2017 it was recorded on the basis of the statement made by the counsel for the appellant that Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore has stayed the proceedings. The counsel for the respondent is not aware about the present status of the matter.
The appellant is directed to produce the copies of the writ petition and all the orders passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore by the next date of hearing. Counsel for the respondent to also verify the
same.
List on 19th July, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 15th February, 2019
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1727-1733/BNG/2017
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal should verify the stay order passed by the High Court of Karnataka on the enforcement proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Neelkanth Rathod
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Smt. Tarabai
Smt. Sindhu
Shri Tarasingh Chittu Chavan
Shri Rahul
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
