The Appellate Tribunal heard multiple appeals and allowed the respondent to file a reply within four weeks. The matter was listed for hearing on 15 February, 2019.
Allowed the respondent to file reply within four weeks; listed for hearing on 15 February 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-3352/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1727/BNG/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Neelkanth Rathod | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
| 2. MP-PMLA-3353/BNG/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3354/BNG/2017 (Exe.) FPA-PMLA-1728/BNG/2017 |
||
| Smt. Tarabai | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
| 3. MP-PMLA-3355/BNG/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3356/BNG/2017 (Exe.) FPA-PMLA-1729/BNG/2017 |
||
| Smt. Sindhu | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
| 4. MP-PMLA-3357/BNG/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3358/BNG/2017 (Exe.) FPA-PMLA-1730/BNG/2017 |
||
| Shri Tarasingh Chittu Chavan | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
| 5. MP-PMLA-3359/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1731/BNG/2017 |
||
| Shri Rahul | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
| 6. MP-PMLA-3360/BNG/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3361/BNG/2017 (Exe.) FPA-PMLA-1732/BNG/2017 |
||
| Sri Seetharam | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director |
||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore | … | Respondent |
| FPA-PMLA-1727-1733/BNG/2017 |
Page 1 of 2 |
&
7. MP-PMLA-3362/BNG/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3363/BNG/2017 (Exe.) FPA-PMLA-1733/BNG/2017 Shri Akshay … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Mohammad Faraz, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 14.09.2018
FPA-PMLA-1727-1733/BNG/2017
Reply has not been filed. One more opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 15th February, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 14th September, 2018
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1727-1733/BNG/2017
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to admit the reply to the appeal and grant time for filing.
Whether to list the appeal for future hearing.
Neelkanth Rathod et al.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
