The tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file a reply to an application and adjourned the matter for instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3363/BNG/2017 (EXE.) MP-PMLA-3362/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1733/BNG/2017
Shri Akashay … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Shailesh Madiyal, Advocate Ms. Shivani Srivastava, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Mohd. Faraz, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 28.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-1733/BNG/2017
Reply has not been filed. Two weeks time is granted to the respondent as last opportunity to file the reply and take the instructions. List on 2nd November, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 28th September, 2017 ‘s’ FPA-PMLA-1733/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
Shri Akashay
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
