A listing order by the Appellate Tribunal for SaFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT Act regarding a miscellaneous application and stay petitions. The court directed the registry to trace a rent enhancement application filed by the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5308/MUM/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3887/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3194/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1666/MUM/2017
Pankaj Bhujbal & Ors. … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Manali Singhal, Advocate Shri Karan Vyas & Santosh Sachin, Advocates For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN ORDER 01.10.2019 MP-PMLA-5308/MUM/2018 (Misc.), MP-PMLA-3887/MUM/2017 (Stay), MP-PMLA-3194/MUM/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA1666/MUM/2017
The application has been filed by the respondent seeking enhancement of the rent. The said application is not traceable in the record. Let the registry trace it out and placed it on record. The appellant is yet to file reply to the aforesaid application and they are seeking time to file the same within three weeks. The copy of the same be served on the other side in advance.
FPA-PMLA-1666/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 2
The learned counsel for the respondent is providing the copy of the said application. He may take the assistance of the learned counsel to trace out the same and return the copy of the reply to the respondent.
List on 24th February, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 01st October, 2019.
‘D’
FPA-PMLA-1666/MUM/2017
Page 2 of 2
Pankaj Bhujbal & Ors.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
