This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-2647/AHD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1414/AHD/2016 |
|
|---|---|
| Hitendrsingh Hamirsingh Wasghela | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad | … Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-2650/AHD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1415/AHD/2016 |
|
| Ketan Mahadevbhai Patel | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad |
… Respondent |
| & | |
| (3) MP-PMLA-2653/AHD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016 |
|
| Uday Navinchandra Sangani | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad | … Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Syed Ahmed Saud, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER
20.11.2019
FPA-PMLA-1414-1416/AHD/2016
Learned counsels for both the parties are present. The learned counsel for the appellants seeks more time to file the written synopsis on the ground that he is yet to get a copy of the Prosecution Complaint and before filing written synopsis. The same is not opposed. Let the same be filed by the next date with an advance copy to be served on other side.
FPA-PMLA-1414-1416/AHD/2016
Page 1 of 2
The learned counsel for the respondent has already filed the written arguments, copy of which has already been served on the other side.
On request, list on 07th April, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 20th November, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1414-1416/AHD/2016
Page 2 of 2
Hitendra Singh Hamirsingh Wasghela
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Ketan Mahadevbhai Patel
Uday Navinchandra Sangani
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
