A stay order in money laundering proceedings adjourned the matter for listing and directed the appellant to pay costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2653/AHD/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016
Uday Navichandra Sangani … Appellant Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mohd. Noorulcah, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 14.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016
Rejoinder right has already been closed. Cost has been paid by the
appellant.
List on 16th January, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 14th August, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016
Page 1 of 1
Uday Navichandra Sangani
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
