FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016 of Uday Navinchandra Sangani v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad

ATFP16 Jan 2017FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The First Appeal in a money laundering case allowing time for filing rejoinder and specifying the correct authority for depositing court costs. The matter was listed for further hearing.

What did the court decide?

Time granted to file rejoinder within six weeks; cost deposit instructions issued; matter listed for April 10, 2017.

FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016 of Uday Navinchandra Sangani v/s The… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-2653/AHD/2016 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2654/AHD/2016 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016

¶3

Uday Navinchandra Sangani … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad … Respondent

¶4

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶5

For the appellant	:	Mr. Mohd. Noorullah, Advocate
For the respondent	:	Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	:	CHAIRMAN
SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA	:	MEMBER
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	:	MEMBER

¶6

ORDER 16.01.2017

¶7

FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016

¶8

Cost has not been deposited by learned counsel for the appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant has brought a bank draft in the name of Registrar General of this Tribunal which is not possible as per the procedure. The learned counsel for the respondent agrees to inform the appellant’s counsel the name of the authority in whose name bank draft is required to be made. Let the cost be paid in the appropriate name within two weeks.

¶9

As far as the appeal is concerned, reply to the appeal as well as stay application has been filed. A newly counsel appointed appeared on behalf of the appellant and seeks time to file the rejoinder to the appeal as well as stay application.

¶10

Let the same be done within six weeks.

¶11

FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

List on 10^th April, 2017.

¶14

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶15

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

¶16

(Anand Kishore)

¶17

Member

¶18

New Delhi, 16^th January, 2017

¶19

‘s’

¶20

FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016

¶21

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016 of Uday Navinchandra Sangani v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1416/AHD/2016 of Uday Navinchandra Sangani v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases