Stay applications and FIA appeals heard where appellant failed to appear or file rejoinder. Appeals listed for January 2020 hearing.
The court noted the absence of the appellant on the substantive hearing and closure of the rejoinder right. Both appeals are listed for hearing on 3rd January, 2020. No adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2458/BNG/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1253/BNG/2016 Prashanth Prabhakar Chodankar … Appellant MP-PMLA-3281/BNG/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3282/BNG/2017 (Exp.) & FPA-PMLA-1708/BNG/2017 Devidas Venkatesh Chodankar … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate on behalf of Sh. Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 23.08.2019
FPA-PMLA-1253/BNG/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1708/BNG/2017
None appeared even on second call from the side of the appellant.
The learned counsel Sh. Atul Tripathi appeared for the respondent on behalf of the learned counsel Sh. Neeraj Atri.
On the last date, one final opportunity was granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to file the rejoinder. No rejoinder has been filed till date. The right of filing the rejoinder is closed.
One more opportunity is granted to both the parties to file the written synopsis.
List both the appeals on 3rd January, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 23rd August, 2019
M
FPA-PMLA-1253/BNG/2016 FPA-PMLA-1708/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
Prashanth Prabhakar Chodankar
Devidas Venkatesh Chodankar
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
