This order adjourned the matter because the appellant failed to appear. It permitted the respondent to file a reply within two weeks to incorporate new facts, with rejoinder filed four weeks thereafter. The matter was listed for hearing on 3rd February 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2458/BNG/2016 (STAY) FPA-PMLA-1253/BNG/2016
Prashanth Prabhakar Chodankar … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
.… Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
05.10.2016
MP-PMLA-2458/BNG/2016 (STAY) & FPA-PMLA-1253/BNG/2016
No one appears on behalf of the appellant.
The learned counsel for the respondent submits that reply is almost ready, however, he seeks some time to file the reply as according to him certain new facts are to be incorporated. Let the same be filed within two weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed four weeks thereafter.
List on 3rd February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 5th October, 2016
‘R’
FPA-PMLA-1253/BNG/2016
Page 1 of 1
Prashanth Prabhakar Chodankar
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
