Single-paragraph order regarding the filing status of a reply in Prevention of Money Laundering Act proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2458/BNG/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1253/BNG/2016
Prashanth Prabhakar Chodankar … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Charudatta Mahindrakar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. S. A. Saud, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 17.08.2017
FPA-PMLA-1253/BNG/2016 & MP-PMLA-2458/BNG/2016 (Stay)
Statement was made by the learned counsel for the respondent that
the reply has been filed. However, the same is not on record, counsel will verify the same in the registry and get it placed on record. In case the reply is not traceable, the counsel will file a photocopy of the same on or before the next date of hearing i.e. 24th January, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 17th August, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1253/BNG/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prashanth Prabhakar Chodankar
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
