FPA-ND-28/BOM/2014 of Rajkumar Kaistha v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal listed for hearing. Appellant in person appears after seeking permission. Respondent Inspecting Officer present.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-ND-234/BOM/2018 (Misc.) MP-ND-134/BOM/2015 (Ex-Parte Stay) FPA-ND-28/BOM/2014
Rajkumar Kaistha … Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Rajkumar Kaistha (Appellant) For the respondent : Shri Ratnesh Srivastava, Inspecting Officer CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER
19.11.2019
FPA-ND-28/BOM/2014
The appellant in person is present. Mr. Ratnesh Srivastava, Inspecting Officer is also present. The appellant submits that his advocate is not responding to the communication made by him and he seeks permission from this Tribunal to argue the matter himself. The same is considered and allowed.
List the appeal for hearing on 29th January, 2020.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajkumar Kaistha
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
G.C. Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court