The appellate court granted four weeks to the appellant to file submissions after confirming receipt of the reply, and disposed of the matter for hearings scheduled in August 2017.
Four weeks time granted to the appellant to file submissions; interim order continued till disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-ND-134/BOM/2015
&
FPA-ND-28/BOM/2014
Rajkumar Kaistha
… Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Gorang Gupta, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Ratnessh Srivastava, I.O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 10.04.2017
MP-ND-134/BOM/2015 & FPA-ND-28/BOM/2014.
Reply is not on record. Mr. Gorang Gupta, Advocate submitted that
the reply has been filed in the registry. The counsel for the appellant has confirmed the copy is received. The counsel will verify the same and in the meanwhile four weeks time is granted to the appellant to file his submissions. MP is accordingly disposed off.
List on 7th August, 2017.
Interim order to continue till the disposal of the appeal.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 10th April, 2017.
‘K’
FPA-ND-28/BOM/2014
Page 1 of 1
Rajkumar Kaistha
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
