FPA-18/LKW/1997 of Shanker Prasad Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow

ATFP23 Jul 2019FPA-18/LKW/1997

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal did not determine the merits of the appeals. The learning counsel for appellants was directed to file a comprehensive chart in tabular form detailing appeal numbers, appellant names, miscellaneous petition numbers for legal heir substitution, and present status in each appeal. The respondent was allowed two weeks to file a reply. This was declared as the last opportunity for clarification before proceeding with the hearing.

What the court decided

AI extract

FPA-18/LKW/1997 of Shanker Prasad Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow — ATFP (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

(1) MP-77/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-93/LKW/2013 (Sub)
MP-18/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-19/LKW/2014 (COD) In
FPA-73/LKW/1996
Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(2) MP-94/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-20/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-21/LKW/2014 (COD) In
FPA-74/LKW/1996
Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(3) MP-92/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In
FPA-75/LKW/1996
Vikas Singh Jaiswal	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(4) MP-79/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-95/LKW/2013 (Sub)
MP-22/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-23/LKW/2014 (COD) In
FPA-76/LKW/1996
Shankar P. Jaiswal	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(5) MP-80/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-96/LKW/2013 (Sub)
MP-24/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-25/LKW/2014 (COD) In
FPA-77/LKW/1996
Shankar P. Jaiswal	…	Appellant/Applicant
FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997		Page 1 of 5

¶3

Versus

¶4

The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (6) MP-81/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-78/LKW/1996 Vishal Singh Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (7) MP-82/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-79/LKW/1996 Vikas Singh Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (8) MP-83/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-80/LKW/1996 Vishal Singh Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (9) MP-84/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-81/LKW/1996 Vishal Singh Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (10) MP-85/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-82/LKW/1996 Vishal Singh Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (11) MP-86/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-83/LKW/1996 Durga P. Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997 Page 2 of 5

¶5

Page 2 of 5

¶6

The Competent Authority, Lucknow

¶7

Respondent

¶8

(12) MP-87/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-84/LKW/1996 Durga P. Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (13) MP-136/LKW/2017 (Misc.) MP-88/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-97/LKW/2013 (Sub) MP-26/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-27/LKW/2014 (COD) In FPA-16/LKW/1997 Durga P. Jaiswal th LH … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (14) MP-89/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-28/LKW/2014 (Sub) MP-29/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-30/LKW/2014 (COD) In FPA-17/LKW/1997 Akash Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (15) MP-90/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-98/LKW/2013 (Sub) MP-31/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-32/LKW/2014 (COD) In FPA-18/LKW/1997 Shanker Prasad Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent (16) MP-91/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-19/LKW/1997 Durga P. Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant

¶9

FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997

¶10

Page 3 of 5

¶11

The Competent Authority, Lucknow

¶12

Respondent

¶13

Versus

¶14

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶15

For the Appellants : Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER

¶16

ORDER 23.07.2019

¶17

FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997

¶18

The learned counsel for the appellants again sought time to file a comprehensive chart. The learned counsel for the respondent strongly objects and states that already a lot of opportunities have been given to them and requests that this may be treated as ‘last opportunity’.

¶19

A lot of time has already been given for the above said exercise and still there is no clarity. Until this exercise is done, it will not be possible to proceed with the hearing. The learned counsel for the appellants seeks six weeks’ time to do the needful.

¶20

The learned counsel for the appellants are directed to file the said comprehensive chart which is yet to be filed in a tabular form with the appeal numbers, the name of the concerned appellant, the Misc. Petition number filed for substitution of the legal heir if any, present Status in each of the appeals, which are listed today with an advance copy to the respondent who may file their reply within two weeks thereafter. This will be the last opportunity.

¶21

FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997

¶22

Page 4 of 5

¶23

The learned counsel for the appellants states that few appeals are not available with them. They may inspect the record of this Tribunal and take copies of the same in the presence of the Registrar, AT.

¶24

subject to payment of prescribed fees.

¶25

List the Miscellaneous Petition for substitution on 15^th October,

¶26

¶27

(Ananya Ray) Member

¶28

New Delhi, 23^rd July, 2019 M

¶29

& FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997

¶30

FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996

¶31

Page 5 of 5

FPA-18/LKW/1997 of Shanker Prasad Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

FPA-18/LKW/1997 of Shanker Prasad Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases