FPA-18/LKW/1997 of Shankar Prasad Jaiswal v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing of the appeal FPA-18/LKW/1997 due to the presence of new counsel for the respondent and the death of a party, with notice for a subsequent hearing.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-90/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-98/LKW/2013 (Sub.) MP-31/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-32/LKW/2014 (COD) & FPA-18/LKW/1997
Shankar Prasad Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate Shri Sharad Prakash Narain, Adv. |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
| 3 | ORDER 1.03.2017 |
FPA-18/LKW/1997
Mr. Munish Kumar, Ld. Advocate submits that he has been recently engaged by the Department and yet he has not received the file from the earlier counsel. Thus the appeal may be heard after some days.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shankar Prasad Jaiswal
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
- other
Sunita Jaiswal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · March
- Case no.
- FPA-18/LKW/1997
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court