Single-member bench listed multiple appeals regarding inspection of files. The court directed inspection on a specific date and asked for a detailed report on the status of appellants and the multiplicity of appeals in a year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-77/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-93/LKW/2013 (Sub) |
||
|---|---|---|
MP-18/LKW/2014 (Abatement) |
||
| MP-19/LKW/2014 (COD) & |
||
| FPA-73/LKW/1996 |
||
| Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal | … | Appellant |
| (2) MP-94/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-20/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-21/LKW/2014 (COD) & |
||
| FPA-74/LKW/1996 | ||
| Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal | … | Appellant |
| (3) MP-92/LKW/2013 (Rest.) & |
||
FPA-75/LKW/1996 |
||
| Vikas Singh Jaiswal | … | Appellant |
| (4) MP-79/LKW/2013 (Rest.) | ||
| MP-95/LKW/2013 (Sub) | ||
| MP-22/LKW/2014 (Abatement) | ||
| MP-23/LKW/2014 (COD) & |
||
| FPA-76/LKW/1996 | ||
| Shankar P. Jaiswal | … | Appellant |
| (5) MP-80/LKW/2013 (Rest.) | ||
| MP-96/LKW/2013 (Sub) | ||
| MP-24/LKW/2014 (Abatement) | ||
| MP-25/LKW/2014 (COD) & |
||
| FPA-77/LKW/1996 |
||
| Shankar P. Jaiswal | … | Appellant |
| (6) MP-81/LKW/2013 (Rest.) | ||
| & | ||
FPA-78/LKW/1996 |
||
| Vishal Singh Jaiswal | … | Appellant |
| (7) MP-82/LKW/2013 (Rest.) & |
||
| FPA-79/LKW/1996 | ||
Vikas Singh Jaiswal |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-73-84/LKW/1996 FPA-16-19/LKW/1997 |
Page 1 of 4 |
(8) MP-83/LKW/2013 (Rest.) & FPA-80/LKW/1996 Vishal Singh Jaiswal … Appellant (9) MP-84/LKW/2013 (Rest.) & FPA-81/LKW/1996 Vishal Singh Jaiswal … Appellant (10) MP-85/LKW/2013 (Rest.) & FPA-82/LKW/1996 Vishal Singh Jaiswal … Appellant (11) MP-86/LKW/2013 (Rest.) & FPA-83/LKW/1996 Durga P. Jaiswal … Appellant (12) MP-87/LKW/2013 (Rest.) & FPA-84/LKW/1996 Durga P. Jaiswal … Appellant (13) MP-136/LKW/2017 (Misc.) MP-88/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-97/LKW/2013 (Sub) MP-26/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-27/LKW/2014 (COD) & FPA-16/LKW/1997 Durga P. Jaiswal LH … Appellant (14) MP-89/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-28/LKW/2014 (Sub) MP-29/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-30/LKW/2014 (COD) & FPA-17/LKW/1997 Akash Jaiswal … Appellant (15) MP-90/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-98/LKW/2013 (Sub) MP-31/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-32/LKW/2014 (COD) & FPA-18/LKW/1997 Shanker Prasad Jaiswal … Appellant FPA-73-84/LKW/1996 Page 2 of 4 FPA-16-19/LKW/1997
(16) MP-91/LKW/2013 (Rest.) &
FPA-19/LKW/1997 Durga P. Jaiswal … Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate Ms. Megha Srivastava, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : MEMBER |
ORDER 14.05.2019
FPA-73-84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16-19/LKW/1997
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks to inspect all the 16 appeal files as his records are not properly kept. The representative of the respondent is also allowed to jointly inspect the files alongwith the counsel for the appellant. In the past one year, directions have been issued by the Bench to: (a) Why there are 16 appeals while the impugned order dated 29.03.1996 has only 6 parties and if there are any overlapping appeals by one single appellant that needs to be rectified (b) The present status of the appellant as to whether he is alive or deceased. If deceased, the name of his Legal Representative which is to be substituted are also to be given.
Inspection of the documents be done on 20th May, 2019 jointly as per the procedure laid down by this Tribunal. An application to be filed by the appellants thereafter within a period of 4 weeks with an advance copy to the FPA-73-84/LKW/1996 Page 3 of 4 FPA-16-19/LKW/1997
respondent giving all the details appellant wise. The respondent to submit his reply within another week thereafter.
List for hearing on 23rd July, 2019.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 14th May, 2019 ‘A’
FPA-73-84/LKW/1996 FPA-16-19/LKW/1997
Page 4 of 4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellants should be allowed to inspect the appeal files and order the respondent to explain the filing of 16 appeals against an order with only 6 parties.
Whether the status of appellants including their survival and legal representative details have been clarified.
Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal and others
The Competent Authority
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
