FPA-16/LKW/1997 of Durga P. Jaiswal th Lh v/s The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Case brief
What is this about?
This order addresses procedural irregularity regarding multiple appeals filed by the same appellant(s) against a single notice. The court ordered the respondent to file an application setting out reasons for the multiplicity of appeals and granted four weeks for the appeal to be consolidated.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-77/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-93/LKW/2013 (Sub) MP-18/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-19/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
|---|---|---|
| FPA-73/LKW/1996 | ||
| Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (2) MP-94/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-20/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-21/LKW/2014 (COD) I |
||
| n FPA-74/LKW/1996 |
||
| Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (3) MP-92/LKW/2013 (Rest.) In FPA-75/LKW/1996 |
||
| Vikas Singh Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (4) MP-79/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-95/LKW/2013 (Sub) MP-22/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-23/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
| FPA-76/LKW/1996 | ||
| Shankar P. Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (5) MP-80/LKW/2013 (Rest.) MP-96/LKW/2013 (Sub) |
||
MP-24/LKW/2014 (Abatement) MP-25/LKW/2014 (COD) In |
||
| FPA-77/LKW/1996 | ||
| Shankar P. Jaiswal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| FPA-73 to 84/LKW/1996 & FPA-16 to 19/LKW/1997 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant time to the appellants to clarify the filing of multiple appeals against a single order.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ghanshyam Dass Jaiswal
- appellant
Vikas Singh Jaiswal
- appellant
Shankar P. Jaiswal
- appellant
Vishal Singh Jaiswal
- appellant
Durga P. Jaiswal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court