Short disposal of a miscellaneous waiver application not pressed by counsel. Adjournment of the underlying forfeiture petition for filing of date list on November 15, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-136/LKW/2017 (Misc) MP-88/LKW/2013 (Rest) MP-97/LKW/2013 (Sub) MP-26/LKW/2014 (Abatment) MP-27/LKW/2014 (COD)
&
FPA-16/LKW/1997
Durga P. Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Anurag Singh, Advocate Shri Aseem Chandra, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate
| CORAM | |
|---|---|
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 25.07.2017
MP-136/LKW/2017 (Misc)
Application has been filed for waiver of cost imposed vide order dated 16th February, 2017. After small hear, learned counsel for the appellant has made the statement not to press the waiver application, and states that the cost shall be paid within six weeks from today.
The Miscellaneous Petition is accordingly disposed of.
FPA-16/LKW/1997
The counsel for the appellant desired to file the complete list of dates as well as the details of the pending applications. The same may be filed on or before the next date.
FPA-16/LKW/1997
Page 1 of 2
Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant wishes to
inspect the file. The same may be inspected as per procedure.
List this matter on 15th November, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra)
Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
25th July, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-16/LKW/1997
Page 2 of 2
Durga P. Jaiswal
The Competent Authority, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
