FPA-PMLA-1856/CHN/2017 of Smt. v. Tamil Rajan v/s Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Case brief
What is this about?
Smt. V. Tamil Rajan V/s Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3831/CHN/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3634/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1856/CHN/2017 Smt. V. Tamil Rajan … Appellant/Applicant MP-PMLA-3832/CHN/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3635/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1857/CHN/2017 Smt. K. Jeyamani … Appellant/Applicant MP-PMLA-3833/CHN/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3636/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1858/CHN/2017 Shri V. Kasimayan … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri M.P. Parthiban, Advocate Shri S. Parthasarathi, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
CORAM |
|
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 15.05.2018
FPA-PMLA-1856-1858/CHN/2017
The appellant in the above said matter has been acquitted. We had reserved the order in the above said matter on 30th March, 2018. Later on, learned counsel for the respondent has filed the copy of the prosecution complaint, which was registered on 12th April, 2018. Both the counsels seek liberty to make their submission in this regard on the next date of hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. V. Tamil Rajan
- appellant
Smt. K. Jeyamani
- appellant
Shri V. Kasimayan
- respondent
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · May
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1856/CHN/2017
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
21 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court