Listing order in a Money Laundering Review Application. The appellant's counsel stated the appellant was acquitted. The tribunal has not addressed the merits but adjourned for further instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3831/CHN/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3634/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1856/CHN/2017
Smt. V. Tamil Rajan … Appellant/Applicant Versus Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri M.P. Parthiban, Advocate Shri S. Parthasarathi, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 08.01.2018
FPA-PMLA-1856/CHN/2017
The learned counsel for the appellant has informed that the appellant has been acquitted by the Judgement dated 1st August, 2017. He agrees to supply the copy to the counsel for the respondent who seeks some time to take the instructions. No further dates shall be given.
List on 13th February, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 08th January, 2018 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1856/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
Smt. V. Tamil Rajan
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Justice Manmohan Singh
Justice Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
