The Appellate Tribunal listed the pending appeals on the next date of hearing after noting that the respondent sought time to file a written synopsis. This is an interlocutory order; the dispute was not disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017 Sh. P. Velmurugan … Applicant/Appellant 2. FPA-PMLA-1744/CHN/2017 K. Velusamy … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri M.P. Parthiban, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 05.12.2018
FPA-PMLA-1743 & 1744/CHN/2017
Written synopsis has been filed by the appellant. Pleadings are complete. Counsel for the respondent seeks time to file the written synopsis. Let the same be filed by the next date of hearing.
List these mattes on 12th March, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 05th December, 2018
‘S’
FPA-PMLA-1743 & 1744/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
P. Velmurugan
K. Velusamy
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
