Listed for adjudication. Reply not filed. Learned Counsel for respondent stated reply is ready to be filed. Appellant's counsel sought time to file rejoinder within four weeks. Pending disposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017
Shri P. Velmurugan
Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Beno Benigar, Advocate Shri Marxin Prabha, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SMT. ANANYA RAY |
: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER |
ORDER 06.11.2017
FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017
Reply is not filed. Mr. Garg states that reply is ready and he would be filing the same in the Registry during the course of the day. The learned Counsel for the appellant seeks time to file the rejoinder within four weeks.
List on 11th April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 06th November, 2017
‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017 Page 1 of 1
Shri P. Velmurugan
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
MANMOHAN SINGH
ANANYA RAY
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
