Partly allowed

FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017 of P. Velmurugan v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

ATFP8 May 2017FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal disposed of three applications. It allowed exemption to file a certified copy of the impugned order and condoned a 13-day delay in filing a fresh appeal under Section 26 of the PMLA, 2002. Additionally, it issued notice in another appeal, granting time to file a reply.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of 13-day delay allowed; exemption from immediate filing of certified copy granted; notice issued with time for reply allowed.

FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017 of P. Velmurugan v/s The Deputy Director… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3371/CHN/2017 (COD) MP-PMLA-3372/CHN/2017 FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017

¶3

P. Velmurugan … Appellant

¶4

Versus

¶5

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

¶6

… Respondent

¶7

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶8

For the appellant	: Sh. P. Shri Santhaaji, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA	: MEMBER
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	: MEMBER

¶9

ORDER 08.05.2017

¶10

MP-PMLA-3372/CHN/2017 (EXP.)

¶11

In the second application, the appellant has sought the exemption for filing the certified copy of the impugned order dated 02.02.2017. The exemption is allowed. Certified copy be filed once the same be received by the appellant.

¶12

MP-PMLA-3371/CHN/2017 (COD)

¶13

A fresh appeal has been filed under section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 challenging the order dated 02.02.2017 in OC No. 630/2016. Alongwith the appeal, an application for Condonation of Delay of thirteen days has also been filed.

¶14

FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

For the reasons stated in the application, the prayer is allowed and

¶17

the application for condonation of delay is disposed of.

¶18

The application is disposed off.

¶19

FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017

¶20

Issue notice to the respondent. Sh. Vikas Garg, Ld Advocate for the respondent accepts the notice and seeks time to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶21

List the matter on 10^th August, 2017.

¶22

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶23

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

¶24

(Anand Kishore) Member

¶25

New Delhi, 8^th May, 2017. M

¶26

FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017

¶27

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017 of P. Velmurugan v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1743/CHN/2017 of P. Velmurugan v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases