The applicant was directed to serve respondents Nos. 2 to 6 and file a rejoinder within four weeks.
Appellant directed to serve respondent no. 2 to 6 and file rejoinder within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2970/CHN/2017 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-1569/CHN/2016
N. Kavita … Appellant/Applicant Versus
The Deputy Director,
Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai & Ors. … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : Mr. N. Rajaraman, Advocate |
|---|---|
| Mr. I. V. Kasyap, Advocate | |
| For the Respondents | : Mr. Mohammad Faraz, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI ANAND KISHORE |
: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER |
ORDER 20.02.2018
FPA-PMLA-1569/CHN/2016
No steps were taken by the appellant to serve the Respondent No. 2 to 6. On the last date of hearing, due to typing mistake it was written that the respondent instead of appellant has not filed the affidavit of service. Under these circumstances the appellant to take the necessary steps to serve the respondent no. 2 to 6.
List on 03rd July, 2018.
In the meanwhile, the appellant is allowed to file the rejoinder within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the respondent.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 20th February, 2018 ‘AS’ FPA-PMLA-1569/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 1
N. Kavita
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
