The Appellate Tribunal, Prevented of Money Laundering Act, listed the FPA-PMLA-1557 to 1560 appeals for 22 January 2019, allowing the interim order to continue. No definitive decision was recorded on the merits.
Listing for 22 January 2019; interim order continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-2949/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1557/DLI/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Neeraj Jain | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| MP-PMLA-2951/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1558/DLI/2016 |
||
| Swarab Lata Jain | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| MP-PMLA-2953/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1559/DLI/2016 |
||
| Rakesh Jain | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| MP-PMLA-2955/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1560/DLI/2016 |
||
| Swaran Overseas Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… | Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives For the appellant : |
who appeared Mr. Shekhar Gup MR. Aarv Kapoor, |
ta, Advocate Advocate |
| For the respondent : |
Sh. Nitesh Rana, | Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : |
CHAIRMAN |
|
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA : |
MEMBER |
| ORDER |
|---|
| 10.10.2018 |
FPA-PMLA-1557-1560/DLI/2016
The learned counsel for the appellant states that he would be filing
the rejoinder in the above mentioned appeals during the course of day.
Let the same be done within two weeks.
FPA-PMLA-1557,1558,1559 & 1560/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 2
List on 22nd January, 2019.
Interim order shall continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 10th October, 2018
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1557,1558,1559 & 1560/DLI/2016
Page 2 of 2
Neeraj Jain and others
The Deputy Director
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
