The appellate order records the absence of a reply and grants liberty to file a rejoinder within four weeks, listing the matter for 01 December 2017.
Liberty granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to file a rejoinder within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2953/DLI/2016 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-1559/DLI/2016
Rakesh Jain
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate Mr. A. R. Aditya, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 15.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-1559/DLI/2016
Reply has not been filed. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the reply is ready and he would be filing the same in the registry during the course of the day. Copy be served to the learned counsel for the appellant who is liberty granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to file the rejoinder within four weeks.
List this matter on 01st December, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 15th September, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1559/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Rakesh Jain
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
