The Tribunal directed service of the respondent's reply on the appellant's counsel for filing a rejoinder and listed the matter for hearing on 18 April, 2018, while maintaining the interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2953/DLI/2016 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1559/DLI/2016
Rakesh Jain … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mohd. Talha, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Debashish Raut, Advocate on Behalf of Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate Shri Sahil, Advocate for HDFC CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 01.12.2017
FPA-PMLA-1559/DLI/2016
The reply has been filed by the respondent though in the index it mentions as Miscellaneous application. It appears that the same has been filed against the appeal. Copy be served to the learned Counsel for the appellant within one week who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 18th April, 2018.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 1st December, 2017 ‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1559/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct service of the respondent's reply on the appellant's counsel and allow filing of the rejoinder.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakesh Jain
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
