The Appellate Tribunal, in a brief order, directed the respondent to file a reply within six weeks as no reply was currently on record. The petition was listed for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2908/MUM/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1461/MUM/2016
Nashik District Central Co-Operative … Appellant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Shubhangi Tuli, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 21.02.2018
FPA-PMLA-1461/MUM/2016
Reply has not been filed. One more opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the reply within six weeks. The order passed in FPAPMLA-1664/MUM/2017 may also be read as part of this case.
List on 09th May, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 21st February, 2018
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1461/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nashik District Central Co-Operative
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
