The Appellate Tribunal listed an appeal and interim application for future hearing. It passed a status quo order regarding the impugned order while allowing the attachment order to continue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEYLAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2908/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1461/MUM/2016
Nashik District Central Co-operative
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Shubhangi Tuli, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 08.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1461/MUM/2016
Reply to the interim application has not been filed. As far as the appeal is concerned, counsel for the respondent states that no reply is necessary. List the appeal as well as interim application on 25th April, 2017.
In the meanwhile, the Status quo order is passed with regard to
the impugned order. However, the attachment order shall continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 08th March, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1461/MUM/2016 Page 1 of 1
Nashik District Central Co-operative
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Justice Manmohan Singh
Justice Kaushal Srivastava
Justice Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
