Counsel could not produce the rejoinder in writ petition FPA-1447/PTN/2016 instead a list on 14 September 2018 was issued for the matter.
The Bench took note that the rejoinder to the writ petition was not on record. Counsel stated time was needed to trace the original document or file a photocopy by the next date. Hearing was listed for 14 September 2018. No decision on the merits was given in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3064/PTN/2017 (U/s 35) & FPA-PMLA-1447/PTN/2016
Ranjit Mandal & Ors. … Appellants Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri Shanto Mukerjee, Advocate & Shri Ashish Prakash, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 06.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-1447/PTN/2016
Rejoinder is not on record. Counsel seeks time to approach the registry and trace the same. Counsel for the appellant also states that in case the original rejoinder is not traceable, he would be filing the photocopy of the same by the next date.
List on 14th September, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray)
Member
New Delhi, 06th April, 2018 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-1447/PTN/2016 Page 1 of 1
Ranjit Mandal & Ors.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
20 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
