Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016 of Smt. Sudeshna Ghosh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

ATFP11 Jul 2018FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-member order acknowledging appearances, noting a request for time to file a reply and a desire to file a counter by the appellant, and directing the appellant to file the counter within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Appellant directed to file counter within four weeks after respondent's reply. Interim order continued.

FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016 of Smt. Sudeshna… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | ATFP (2018)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

(1) MP-PMLA-2977/KOL/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1361/KOL/2016
Shashi Kiran Gandhi & Anr.	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata	…	Respondent
(2) MP-PMLA-2978/KOL/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1362/KOL/2016
Ramesh Gandhi & Anr.	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata	…	Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who	appeared
For the Appellant :	Mr. Nisha	ank Mattoo, Advocate
For the Respondent :	Mr. Navee Advocate	n Kumar Matta,
(3) MP-PMLA-3713/KOL/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3714/KOL/2017 (A.D.) &
FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016
Smt. Sudeshna Ghosh	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata	…	Respondent
(4) MP-PMLA-3711/KOL/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3712/KOL/2017 (A.D.) &
FPA-PMLA-1359/KOL/2016
Santanu Ghosh	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata	…	Respondent
FPA-PMLA-1361, 1362, 1352 & 1359/KOL/2016		Page 1 of 2

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the Appellant	: None
For the Respondent	: Mr.Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate
CORAM
SMT. ANANYA RAY	: MEMBER

¶5

ORDER 11.07.2018

¶6

FPA-PMLA-1361/KOL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1362/KOL/2016, FPA-PMLA1352/KOL/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1359/KOL/2016

¶7

The learned Counsel for the respondent, Mr. Matta stated that he needs some more time to file the reply. He also stated that he will be filing for modification of the interim order dated 22.12.2016. The learned Counsel for the appellant has no objection. The learned Counsel for the appellant also desires to file a counter. Allowed. The appellant may file the counter within four weeks after the reply has been filed a copy of which will be served by the respondent on the appellant.

¶8

List on 18^th September, 2018.

¶9

Interim order to continue.

¶10

(Ananya Ray) Member

¶11

New Delhi, 11^th July, 2018. ‘r’

¶12

FPA-PMLA-1361, 1362, 1352 & 1359/KOL/2016

¶13

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016 of Smt. Sudeshna Ghosh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016 of Smt. Sudeshna Ghosh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases