This order is a procedural direction from the Prevention of Money Laundering Act Appellate Tribunal in New Delhi. It requires the filing of a reply within two weeks, after which the matter was adjourned to be listed on 17 August 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016 Smt. Sudeshna Ghosh … Appellant/ Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Parmatma Singh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 30.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016
Reply is not on record. If already not filed, let the same be filed within two weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 17th August, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 30th March, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Smt. Sudeshna Ghosh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
