FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016 of Smt. Sudeshna Ghosh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

ATFP7 Dec 2016FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this interim order, the Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the appeal within six weeks despite the appellant's objection. Liberty was granted to move for interim relief upon receiving a notice under section 8(4) of the PMLA. The matter was listed for further proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Granted liberty to move for interim relief upon receipt of notice under section 8(4). Fixed deadline for reply and rejoinder.

FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016 of Smt. Sudeshna Ghosh v/s The Deputy… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2016)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016

¶3

Smt. Sudeshna Ghosh … Appellant/ Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent

¶4

… Respondent

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the appellant	: Shri Vinay Ranjan, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER
SHRI B.K. BANSAL	: MEMBER

¶7

ORDER

¶8

07.12.2016

¶9

FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016

¶10

Reply has not been filed. The counsel for the respondent states that in case the appellant would make the submission that no new grounds or additional facts has been stated in the ground of appeal then no reply would be required. The learned counsel for the appellant is not agreeable to the suggestion made by the counsel for the respondent. Let the reply be filed within six weeks as a last opportunity with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶11

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that so far no notice under section 8(4) has been received by the appellant. As soon as the

¶12

FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

notice is received he would be moving the application for interim relief.

¶15

The liberty is granted accordingly.

¶16

List on 30^th March, 2017.

¶17

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶18

(G.C. Mishra) Member

(B.K. Bansal)

Member

New Delhi,

7^th December, 2016.

¶23

‘D’

¶24

FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016

¶25

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016 of Smt. Sudeshna Ghosh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1352/KOL/2016 of Smt. Sudeshna Ghosh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases