Appeal under the Foreign Exchange Management Act. Appellant sought adjournment to comply with a Bombay High Court date. Court adjourned to allow instructions.
Adjourned to enable the appellant to seek instructions from his client for compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-20/MUM/2013
M/s. Meridian Export & Industries
… Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Dushyant, Advocate For the Respondent 2 & 3 : Ms. Aagam Kaur, & Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultants.
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 21.03.2018
FPA-FE-20/MUM/2013
It appears that the appellant has not complied with the order dated 21st November, 2016 passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. The counsel for the appellant states that the appellant by the next date his client may be agreed me to deposit the same within four weeks however, he seeks an adjournment to take instruction from his client in this regard.
List on 4th April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 21st March, 2018. ‘K’
FPA-FE-20/MUM/2013
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Meridian Export & Industries
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
