The adjudication requested by the appellant was adjourned to the next date, as counsel sought time to submit details for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-190/MUM/2008
Smt. Sushma Shantilal Nahar & Ors. … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent & FPA-FE-214/MUM/2008 Smt. Sushma Shantilal Nahar & Ors. … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Viraj Kadam, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant Mrs. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 27.11.2018
FPA-FE-190/MUM/2008 & FPA-FE-214/MUM/2008
COD application was heard for some time. However learned counsel for the appellant wanted to give certain details with regard to the present case which could help in deciding the issue and sought some time. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. Accordingly a short adjournment is given to hear the COD application on the next date of hearing.
List on 17th January, 2019.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 27th November, 2018 ‘AS’
FPA-FE-190/MUM/2008 & FPA-FE-214/MUM/2008
Page 1 of 1
Smt. Sushma Shantilal Nahar & Ors.
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
