Old stay application pending; appellant requested adjournment due to missing documents. Court one-week adjournment at counsel's risk.
Proceedings in a Foreign Principal Agent case where applicant sought adjournment due to missing files; court granted one-week time reluctantly despite objecting respondent's stance on age of case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) FPA-FE-190/MUM/2008 Smt. Sushma Shantilal Nahar & Ors. … Appellants / Applicants Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent (2) FPA-FE-214/MUM/2008 Smt. Sushma Shantilal Nahar & Ors. … Appellants / Applicants Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Viraj Kadam, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER ORDER 15.11.2018
FPA-FE-190 & 214/MUM/2008
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks some time since he does not have all the documents/files with him. The learned counsel for the respondent strongly objects as it is a very old case and the stay petition is still pending. In the interest of justice, very reluctantly, I give one week’s time.
The learned counsel for the appellant will come prepared with the documents etc. on the next date of hearing.
List on 27th November, 2018.
(Ananya Ray)
Member
New Delhi, 15th November, 2018. ‘D’
FPA-FE-190 & 214/MUM/2008
Page 1 of 1
Sushma Shantilal Nahar & Ors.
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
