National Company Law Appellate Tribunal granted an adjournment in a reference matter due to the availability of main counsel for the respondent.
Adjournment granted list to 1st August 2018
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-1064/BNG/2004
Sh. K. Mohd. Imran
… Appellant
Versus
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. Ahmad Parvez, Adv. For the respondent : Sh. Pankaj Yadav, L.C. for Sh. Prashant Panday, L.C. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 07.03.2018
FPA-FE-1064/BNG/2004
Mr. Pankaj Yadav, is appeared on behalf of the Prashant Pandey, L.C. and seeks an adjournment as the main counsel is not available due to personal reason. He says by the next date counsel verify about the status of the writ pending filed by the appellant in High Court.
List on 1st August, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 7th March, 2018 ‘s’
FPA-FE-1064/BNG/2004
Page 1 of 1
Sh. K. Mohd. Imran
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
