FPA-12/BOM/2005 of Hasina Ibrahim Parker v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Hasina Ibrahim Parker V/s The Competent…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-54/BOM/2014 (L.H.) MP-55/BOM/2014 (Add. Grds.) &
FPA-12/BOM/2005 Hasina Ibrahim Parker … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Maroof Ahmed, Advocate on Behalf of Shri B.U. Barqi Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri R.N. D’ Souza, Joint Commissioner & Shri Stanley Joseph, Inspecting Officer |
| CORAM | |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : MEMBER |
| ORDER 10.04.2018 |
FPA-12/BOM/2005
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks an adjournment on
the ground that the main counsel is before the Supreme Court in a related matter of the same party today. The learned representative of the respondent states that they have not yet paid the cost levied on the last occasion. Moreover, the miscellaneous petition for fixation of rent has also been pending for quite some time. Adjourned today.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hasina Ibrahim Parker
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
Ananya Ray
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court