FPA-10/BOM/2014 of Reshma S. Waghmare v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellants were absent. Tribunal vacated a stay granted in 2014 because rent remained unpaid and the previous orders were not honoured. Hearing adjourned to July 2018.
What did the court decide?
Stay vacated; case fixed for final hearing on 04.07.2018 with warning of adverse inference.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
1. MP-49/BOM/2014 (S.P.) & FPA-9/BOM/2014 Sanjay N. Waghmare … Appellant/Applicant & 2. MP-50/BOM/2014 (S.P.) & FPA-10/BOM/2014 Reshma S. Waghmare … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : None |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Stanly Joseph, Inspecting Officer |
| CORAM SMT ANANYA RAY |
: MEMBER |
| ORDER 09.04.2018 |
FPA-9 & 10/BOM/2014
No one appears on behalf of the appellant, although during the last date of hearing i.e. on 09th January, 2018 the learned counsel for the appellant Mr. Lilesh P. Sawant was present and today’s date was declared in the open court. The Registry informs that they have received no request for any adjournment.
FPA-9 & 10/BOM/2014
Page 1 of 2
A stay was given to them vide this Tribunal order dated 16.09.2014. Since they have failed to appear today, I am vacating the stay. The learned representative for the respondent states that the Tribunal’s last order of 09.01.2018 has not been honoured and they have paid no rent as yet.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sanjay N. Waghmare
- appellant
Reshma S. Waghmare
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court