FPA-10/BOM/2014 of Reshma S. Waghmare v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Reshma S. Waghmare V/s The Competent…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY, NEW DELHI
MP-50/BOM/2014 (S.P.) FPA-10/BOM/2014 Reshma S. Waghmare … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri R.N. D’souza, Joint Commissioner & Shri Ratnessh Srivastava, Inspecting Officer CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 05.12.2017
FPA-FE-10/BOM/2004
No one appears for the appellant. They have sent request for an adjournment on the ground that they have filed the writ petition before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court against the Tribunal order dated 18th May, 2015 which is listed for hearing today (i.e. 05.12.2017). Accordingly an adjournment is granted. Shri R.N. D’souza, Joint Commissioner, Competent Authority appeared for the respondent and he stated that the rent for the property has not yet been fixed. In the interest of justice, I allow the short adjournment as requested by the appellants and the issue of rent would be taken up on the next date of hearing.
List on 9th January, 2018.
Notice to be issued to the appellant and his counsel by the registry.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Reshma S. Waghmare
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
Ananya Ray
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court