The Appellate Tribunal listed a forfeiture appeal for final hearing on 27 March 2017 following a delay in raising an adjournment prayer regarding receipt of a prior order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-50/BOM/2014 (SP) &
FPA-10/BOM/2014
Rashma S. Waghmare … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Lilesh P. Sawant, Advocate For the respondent : Sh. Stanly Joseph, Inspecting Officer CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER
ORDER 09.01.2017
FPA-10/BOM/2014
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the copy of the order dated 18th May, 2015 has been received by him only today in which the application dated 6th February, 2015 for production of additional documents filed by the appellant has been rejected. He seeks an adjournment. The request is not opposed on behalf of the respondent.
List the appeal for final hearing on 27th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
New Delhi, 9th January, 2017
‘s’
FPA-10/BOM/2014
Page 1 of 1
Rashma S. Waghmare
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
