The Appellate Tribunal, PMLA heard a petition where the appellant expressed willingness to deposit the imposed cost. The Tribunal ordered the payment via bank draft within two weeks and listed the matter for further proceedings.
Costs to be deposited by bank draft within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1494/LKW/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-732/LKW/2014
(ECIR/PTZO/04/2013 dated 16.05.2013 PAO No. 03/2014 dated 31.03.2014, O.C No. 318/2014
M/s AMR Infrastructure Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Gaurav Verma, Advocate For the respondent : Sh. S.P. Nigam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 13.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-732/LKW/2014
Mr. Gaurav Verma, employ of AMR Infrastructure Ltd. stated that
the appellant want to deposit the cost imposed by this Tribunal. Let the cost be deposited by bank draft with the respondent within two weeks.
List on 1st March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 13th February, 2017. ‘ s ’
FPA-PMLA-732/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
M/s AMR Infrastructure Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
