Order laying the matter on the rules listing a rejoinder and costs for future consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1494/LKW/2015 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-732/LKW/2014
M/s AMR Infrastructure Ltd.
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Ajay Verma, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER
ORDER
25.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-732/LKW/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant states that the rejoinder is
ready and would be filed during the course of the day along with proof of payment of cost imposed.
List on 13th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
New Delhi,
25th November, 2016
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-732/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
M/s AMR Infrastructure Ltd.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
