The appellant was absent. The Tribunal directed payment of costs to the respondent's counsel within two weeks and listed the matter for the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1494/LKW/2015 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-732/LKW/2014
M/s AMR Infrastructure Ltd.
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri Dharan Dev, Advocate, Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
01.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-732/LKW/2014
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. The appellant is
directed to pay the cost to the learned counsel for the respondent within two weeks against the receipt. List on 27th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
01st March, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-732/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
M/s AMR Infrastructure Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
