The Appellate Tribunal granted interim stay on an interim order until the next hearing.
Interim stay extended to the next date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3364/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1735/MUM/2017
63 Moons technologies Ltd.
… Appellant
Versus
The Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. Rajeev Nayar, Sr. Advocate For the respondent : Sh. S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 12.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-1735/MUM/2017
The counsel for the respondent submits that the reply is not necessary because no new additional ground has not been taken rather the respondent seeks time to file written submission. Let the same be filed by the respondent on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 20th July, 2017 at 2:30 PM.
Interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 12th May, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1735/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 1
MP-PMLA-3364/MUM/2017
The Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
26 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
