Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

ATFP16 Aug 2017FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An interim hearing in a PMLA appeal where the Tribunal adjourned the main appeal, granted the appellant time to file supporting documents, and allowed the respondent time to file their written synopsis.

What did the court decide?

Appellant granted two weeks to file notification and sale deed copies; respondent granted time to file synopsis by next date.

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017

¶3

S. Mahesh	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai	…	Respondent

¶4

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶5

For the appellant	: Shri Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate Ms. E. Omprakash, Advocate Ms. Madhusmita, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	: MEMBER

¶6

ORDER

¶7

16.08.2017

¶8

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017

¶9

The learned counsel for both the parties admit that the order passed by this Tribunal on 21^st February, 2017 in interim applications have been challenged by the respondent in the High Court of Judicature at Madras by filing of the appeals being 1561/2017 to 1567/2017. Those are still pending. The interim protection granted by this Tribunal by order dated 21.02.2017 to the appellants were ordered to be stayed. One set of the paper book was sent to the Hon’ble High Court as directed.

¶10

On the last date of hearing and today part submissions are made by the learned counsel for the appellant in main appeal.

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017

¶13

The learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to file the copy of the notification shown the guidelines value as well as the comparative sale deed(s). Let the same be done within two weeks. The appellant has filed the written synopsis in the main appeal. The counsel for the respondent is seeking time to file the written synopsis. Let the same may be filed on or before the next date.

¶14

List on 11^th September, 2017 at 2.30 p.m.

¶15

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶16

(Anand Kishore) Member

¶17

New Delhi, 16^th August, 2017

¶18

‘d’

¶19

Page 2 of 2

¶20

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017 of S. Mahesh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases