The Appellate Tribunal directed that the fresh application filed by the respondent be listed on 13th October, 2017, dismissing the appellant's submission that a reply was unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3108/CHN/2017 (Misc) &
FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017
S. Mahesh … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. E. Omprakash, Senior Advocate Ms. Madhusumita Bora, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 05.10.2017
FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017 & MP-PMLA-3108/CHN/2017 (Misc)
Fresh application has been filed by the respondent who has also made his submissions in the main appeal for sometime. Counsel for appellant submits that the reply to fresh application is not required.
At request, list on 13th October, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 05th October, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1626/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
S. Mahesh
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
MANMOHAN SINGH
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
